x

75% of people globally want unbiased news (Pew Research) but are concerned they're not getting that.

Get balanced coverage with Symby. See how stories are covered across diverse outlets and spot when one side covers a story the other skips.

PODCAST

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog

Gabriel Weinberg

Tech, policy, and business insights from the DuckDuckGo founder and co-author of Traction and Super Thinking. gabrielweinberg.com

technology news commentary

All Episodes

4:56

Most chatbot users miss this key setting, so we moved...

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/07/20

The magic of chatbots is that they make it seem like you’re chatting with a real person. But the default personality of this “person” isn’t one I particularly enjoy talking to, and in many cases I find downright annoying. Based on feedback from duck.ai users—who rely on our service for private access to popular chatbots—I know I’m not alone. What people want in a chatbot’s personality varies widely: I cringe at extra exclamation points and emojis, while others love them. I also find the default

en

5:38

The debate over a potential economic bump from AI...

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/07/08

The decade surrounding the Internet boom saw a marked increase in U.S. total factor productivity (TFP) growth—the economic efficiency gains beyond just adding more workers or capital—similar to higher levels seen before 1973. However, it then declined again from 2005 onward back to doldrums levels, which brings us to the present. Now, people are starting to debate a similar potential AI productivity bump unfolding over the next decade.However, this debate raises an even bigger question: How do we

en

5:26

States should be allowed to regulate AI because...

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/06/26

A provision in the “Big Beautiful Bill” (the massive federal spending and policy package currently being negotiated) aims to stop all state-level AI regulation for the next ten years. Now, I’m not anti-AI. My company (DuckDuckGo) offers our own private chatbot service at Duck.ai, we now generate millions of anonymous AI-assisted answers daily for our private search engine, and we are working on more AI features in our browser. We’re investing heavily in AI because, to achieve our aim of protecting

en

5:06

Rule #2: There are always underlying assumptions.

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/06/21

Every decision rests on assumptions. At minimum, you’re assuming the options you’re considering are actually all of your options. This set of options is, in turn, based on a set of assumed facts, which is, in turn, based on even more assumptions about how the world works.I’ve seen this pattern repeatedly: teams spend hours debating the details of Option A versus Option B, only to discover they never considered Option C—or that their entire framing of the problem was based on outdated or misaligned

en

7:30

Issues with widespread bipartisan agreement that...

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/06/15

In a country currently known for deep political divisions, some issues still garner supermajority agreement, yet nothing gets done about them. To me, these issues simultaneously represent hope and despair:* Hope—yes, we can agree on some important things.* Despair—uh oh, our widespread agreement isn’t translating into actual change.In other words, the existence of issues with durable, supermajority agreement, which nevertheless never materializes into change, is a strong indicator that we need some

en

13:56

U.S. AI-labor protests could eventually resemble the...

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/06/08

I do not yet have a well-formed opinion on the net impact of AI on job loss across different time scales. Will it be a large, net negative, or will it be close to net neutral, similar to previous technology cycles? “Expert” estimates are all over the place, and while there is little job loss directly attributable to AI right now, circumstantial evidence is accumulating.That said, I believe it is clear that even in a net-positive scenario, many jobs will be displaced as new ones are created. For

en

10:16

How science funding literally pays for itself

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/05/31

Previously, I gave an overview of eleven justifications for why public science funding is way too low: (1) longevity—living longer, (2) defense—wars of the future, (3) returns —pays for itself, (4) prosperity—long-term driver of productivity growth, (5) innovation—better everday products, (6) resilience—insurance for future calamities, (7) jobs—creates some now, and then better jobs in the future, (8) frontier—sci-fi is cool, (9) sovereignty—reduce single points of failure in the economy, (10)

en

8:38

Will the AI backlash spill into the streets?

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/05/24

AI backlash is rising—I see it every day in DuckDuckGo user feedback. That’s why our AI features (Search Assist and Duck.ai) are private, useful, and optional.Concern alone won’t flood the streets—but if AI wipes out paychecks fast, and Washington stalls, more sustained protests and strikes could follow.An April 2025 Pew Research report found widespread AI concern across various topics—jobs, privacy, inaccurate information, loss of human connection, the environment, and bias—but I think jobs can

en

4:20

Americans’ tolerance for lengthy economic disruption...

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/05/17

Putting aside whether you or I believe in the potential benefits of widespread tariffs, I found this recent Gallup report fascinating regarding how Americans perceive their tolerance for the “short-term pain, long-term gain” tariff narrative. The chart below from Gallup shows that just 26% of U.S. adults would accept any disruption for more than a year.That leaves one-third of Republicans, 28% of independents and 15% of Democrats willing to endure a multiyear economic disruption to realize the

en

14:30

Science funding was already way too low.

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/05/10

Cutting federal research funding is extremely short-sighted, but the previous funding levels were also short-sighted. I think those previous levels were off by something like 3x. There are so many compelling and synergistic justifications as to why, that it can be overwhelming to reason (and write!) about. So, in this post, I’m going to list ten justifications out at a high level, and plan to explore more nuance in the future.Subscribe for free to receive new posts.Justifications for increasing

en

5:51

Rule 1: Reality is always more complicated.

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/05/03

I’ve always been drawn to characters with “rules.”I’ve been noodling some rules over the past few years myself, on making good decisions.Subscribe for free to receive new posts.Rule 1: Reality is always more complicated.I prefer the more general framing, but this is also phrased as “the map is not the territory” because every map is an imperfect representation of what it represents. For example, Apple Maps won’t tell me where the current potholes are, nor does it have all the trees placed correctly

en

6:53

Is runaway AI coming in years or decades?

Gabriel Weinberg"s Blog ·

2025/04/27

I’ve been trying to heed the call to prepare for the powerful AI that is coming. But, is it coming soon, like in 2027 (see AI 2027), or significantly later, like in 2045 (see AI as Normal Technology)? Either way, we should prepare, but knowing whether it is coming in years or decades would make a huge difference in that preparation. Subscribe for free to receive new posts.The pieces referenced each make compelling cases for the shorter or longer timeframes (another good one on the longer side is The

en

32 results

Similar Podcasts

Lead With AI

Tamara Nall

Linux in the Ham Shack

Black Sparrow Media

Data Engineering Podcast

Tobias Macey

Eye On A.I.

Craig S. Smith

Reflections

Livewire Labs