U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments

60:50

Shular v. United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/21

A case in which the Court held that the Armed Career Criminal Act’s “serious drug offense” definition requires only that a state offense involve the conduct specified in the statute; it does not require that the state offense match certain generic offenses.

en

61:21

GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu...

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/21

A case in which the Court held that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards does not prohibit the application of domestic equitable estoppel doctrine to allow a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement to compel arbitration.

en

59:21

Babb v. Wilkie

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/15

A case in which the Court held that the federal-sector provision of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 demands that personnel actions be untainted by any consideration of age, but but-for causation is important in determining the appropriate remedy that may be obtained.

en

57:52

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/14

A case in which the Court held that under Section 35 of the Lanham Act, a plaintiff does not need to show willful infringement to receive an award of an infringer’s profits for a violation of Section 43(a).

en

60:16

Kelly v. United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/14

A case in which the Court held that Baroni and Kelly, who executed the New Jersey “Bridgegate” political retribution scheme against Fort Lee’s mayor, did not violate the federal-program fraud or wire fraud laws because they did not aim to obtain money or property from the federal Port Authority.

en

61:36

Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashions Group Inc.

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/13

A case in which the Court held that because the trademark action at issue challenged different conduct—and raised different claims—from an earlier action between the parties, Marcel cannot preclude Lucky Brand from raising new defenses, including a defense that Lucky Brand failed to press fully in the earlier suit.

en

62:27

Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2020/01/13

A case in which the Court held that an ERISA plan participant lacks judicial standing to seek injunctive relief or restoration of plan losses caused by fiduciary breach if he cannot demonstrate individual financial loss or the imminent risk thereof.

en

59:22

McKinney v. Arizona

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/11

A case in which the Court held that a state court of appeals, not a jury, can reweigh aggravating and mitigating circumstances on habeas corpus review in death penalty cases.

en

60:10

Monasky v. Taglieri

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/11

A case in which the Court held that a child’s “habitual residence” under the Hague Convention depends on the totality of the circumstances specific to the case, not categorical requirements such as an actual agreement between parents.

en

47:07

Holguin-Hernandez v. United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/10

A case in which the Court held that a criminal defendant's district-court argument for a specific sentence preserved his claim on appeal that the sentence imposed was unreasonably long.

en

60:40

Maine Community Health Options v. United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/10

A case in which the Court held that the federal government has an obligation to pay the insurance carriers in this case for losses incurred under the "Risk Corridors" program of the Affordable Care Act as a result of their participation in the health care marketplace.

en

58:16

Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/09

A case in which the Court held that the phrase “questions of law” in the Immigration and Nationality Act’s Limited Review Provision, 8 U. S. C. §1252(a)(2)(D), includes the application of a legal standard to undisputed or established facts.

en

62:38

Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies, LP

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/09

A case in which the Court held that 35 U.S.C. §314(d) precludes judicial review of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to institute inter partes review upon finding that §315(b)’s time bar did not apply.

en

61:40

Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/04

A case in which the Court held that under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 requirement that plaintiffs with “actual knowledge” of an alleged fiduciary breach must file suit within three years of gaining that knowledge, a plaintiff does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the information contained in disclosures that he receives but does not read or cannot recall reading.

en

58:54

Banister v. Davis

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/04

A case in which the Court held that a timely Rule 59(e) motion to “amend or alter” a habeas court’s judgment is not a second or successive habeas petition.

en

61:19

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian, et al.

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/03

A case in which the Court held that the landowners in this case were potentially responsible parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and thus need the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval to take remedial action.

en

59:56

Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/03

A case in which the Court vacated the ruling below that had applied a federal common-law rule on how to allocate a tax refund paid to an affiliated group.

en

62:24

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v....

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/02

A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether New York City’s ban on transporting a licensed, locked, and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits is consistent with the Second Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the constitutional right to travel.

en

60:56

Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org Inc.

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/12/02

A case in which the Court held that the government edict doctrine extends to—and thus renders uncopyrightable—the annotations in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated.

en

59:30

Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African...

U.S. Supreme Court 2019 Term Arguments ·

2019/11/13

A case in which the Court held that a claim of race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 requires that the plaintiff show that race was a but-for cause of the plaintiff's injury.

en

All Episodes

Similar Podcasts

Big Cabbage Radio

Mike Chmielewski

AM Quincy

Quincy Access Television (QATV)

Bilbo Hiria irratia

Platform

Wale Bakare

Lignes de défense

RFI