PODCAST

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

government & organizations national

All Episodes

61:59

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/03/21

A case in which the Court determined that a patentee’s decision to sell an item exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, even if the e patentee purports to impose post-sale restrictions, and regardless of whether the sale occurs domestically or internationally.

60:59

Microsoft v. Baker

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/03/21

A case in which the Court determined that the federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to review an order denying class certification after the named plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their claims with prejudice.

72:19

Murr v. Wisconsin

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/03/20

A case in which the Court determined that, in a regulatory takings case, two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels should be combined for takings analysis purposes.

53:01

Howell v. Howell

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/03/20

A case in which the Court determined that the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act prevents state courts from treating the waived portion of military retirement pay as a divisible community asset for the purpose of divorce proceedings.

Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. Nevils

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/03/01

A case in which the Court determined that the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act (FEHBA) preempts state laws that prohibit insurance companies from claiming the proceeds of personal injury settlements pursuant to their contracts, and the express preemption clause of the FEHBA does not violate the Supremacy Clause.

Dean v. United States

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/02/28

A case in which the Court determined that 18 U.S.C. §924(c) does not prevent a sentencing court from using its discretion to consider the other mandatory minimum sentences a defendant might be facing when calculating an overall appropriate sentence.

Packingham v. North Carolina

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/02/27

A case in which the Court determined that the North Carolina law prohibiting registered sex offenders from accessing various websites, where minors are known to be active and have accounts, regardless of whether or not the sex offender directly interacted with a minor violates the First Amendment.

Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/02/27

A case in which the Court determined that the crime of “unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor” as defined by California law cannot be categorically considered the aggravated felony of “sexual abuse of a minor” for the purpose of mandatory removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. Clark

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/02/22

A case in which the Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts Kentucky state-law precedent that requires a clear statement in the power of attorney agreement in order to grant an attorney-in-fact the power to bind her principal to an arbitration agreement.

50:08

McLane Company, Inc. v. E.E.O.C

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/02/21

A case in which the Court will decide whether a district court’s decision to enforce an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission subpoena should be reviewed “de novo,” or without deference to the lower court’s determination.

Hernandez v. Mesa

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/02/21

A case in which the Court determined that qualified immunity may not be granted based on facts that were unknown to the officer at the time of the incident, and that a court should consider whether an implied right of action is appropriate under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents before addressing sensitive Fourth Amendment questions.

Matal v. Tam

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/18

A case in which the Court determined that the Disparagement Clause prohibits trademarks that disparage the members of a racial or ethnic group and violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.

Ziglar v. Abbasi

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/18

A case in which the Court determined that, in suits against government officials for personally violating the Constitution, “context” should be defined narrowly for the purpose of determining whether a claim arose in a “new context,” and the government officials in this case are entitled to qualified immunity.

Midland Funding v. Johnson

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/17

A case in which the Court determined that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) does not prevent a creditor from filing a proof of claim on an unpaid debt in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding even after the statute of limitations on that debt has run.

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/11

A case in which the Court determined that, in order to provide children with disabilities a free and appropriate public education as guaranteed by the IDEA, school districts must offer children an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) that is reasonably calculated to enable each child to make progress appropriate for that child’s circumstances.

Goodyear Tire v. Haeger

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/10

A case in which the court held that, when a federal court sanctions bad-faith conduct by ordering a litigant to pay the other side’s legal fees, the award is limited to the fees the innocent party incurred solely due to the misconduct.

Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/10

A case in which the Court decided that the New York General Business Law’s was not unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Nelson v. Colorado

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/09

A case in which the Court decided that the Colorado Exoneration Act, which requires exonerated persons to “prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that they were ‘actually innocent’” in order to refund their money, does not comport with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Lewis v. Clarke

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2017/01/09

A case in which the Court determined that tribal sovereign immunity is not implicated in a suit against a tribal employee in his individual capacity, and an indemnification provision cannot extend tribal sovereign immunity to conduct that it would not otherwise cover.

Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments ·

2016/12/07

A case in which the Court determined that bankruptcy court cannot authorize a distribution of settlement proceeds in a manner that does not comply with the Bankruptcy Code’s priority distribution scheme.

62 results

U.S. Supreme Court 2016 Term Arguments

All Episodes

Similar Podcasts

The Michigan DNR"s Wildtalk Podcast

Michigan Department of Natural...

Bilbo Hiria irratia

Mises Institute

Jua Haki Zako

RFI Kiswahili

Finding Arizona Podcast

Jose Acevedo