After the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, defense attorney Kevin Reddington filed a motion that claimed there is no evidence Lindsay killed her children. True crime communities assumed a strategy shift — from postpartum psychosis to blaming Patrick Clancy. The assumption is wrong. Reddington’s filing is a Rule 25(b) motion, a procedural argument that the prosecution failed to enter direct physical evidence of the act into the official court record. The motion was written for a judge, not for the public

Kevin Reddington filed a motion after the Lindsay Clancy mistrial stating there is no evidence Lindsay killed her children. True crime circles assumed the defense was pointing the finger at Patrick Clancy. That reading is wrong. The filing is a Rule 25(b) motion — a procedural argument that the prosecution’s trial record lacks direct physical evidence of the act. It’s a technical challenge to evidentiary sufficiency, not a narrative shift and not an accusation. But the distinction doesn’t matter to

In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (Civil Action No.: 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Plaintiff Jane Doe has filed a memorandum opposing Defendant Leon Black's motion to compel her to publicly disclose her full name. Doe argues that revealing her identity would subject her to undue harassment and invasion of privacy, especially given the sensitive nature of the allegations, which include sexual assault. She emphasizes that proceeding under a pseudonym is essential to protect her from potential retaliation

Popok reports on new filings in the Katie Phang litigation in which the DOJ, more than a year later, still refuses to release to the public (especially before the midterm election) the handwritten notes of interviews with an alleged child sex abuse victim of Trump, while the Epstein Scandal becomes a political albatross for many republicans as Epstein Survivors and their families run ads against them in in swing districts.Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Become a

Robert De Niro and Mark Ruffalo are sounding the alarm about Republicans “stealing” the midterm elections — weeks before voters even head to the polls. Larry breaks down the Hollywood rally, Ruffalo’s extraordinary election warnings and what the rhetoric says about the closing stretch of the campaign. Raise your hand as a Social Security voter: https://AARP.org/SocialSecurityVoterBecome a Townhall VIP member with promo code "LARRY": https://townhall.com/subscribeSee

I examine Ukraine’s emerging war plan, command restructuring, AI-enabled drone defense, and the Nika interceptor against jet-powered Shaheds. I also assess NATO’s Theory of Victory for the eastern flank, Estonia’s posture, Moldova attacks, and Germany’s expanding military support for Ukraine.00:00 Ukraine and NATO Unveil New Strategies 02:19 AI Turrets and Defense Against Jet-Powered Drones 04:37 Kyiv’s Winter Energy Threat 05:58 European Embassies Remain in Kyiv 07:44 Germany’s Warning and

In the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Defendant Leon Black filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jane Doe's complaint. Black's legal team argues that Doe's allegations are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations and fail to meet the necessary legal standards for the claims presented. They assert that the complaint lacks specific factual details to substantiate the accusations, rendering the claims insufficient under federal pleading

In court filings responding to JPMorgan Chase’s lawsuit, Jes Staley went on the offensive, arguing that the bank was attempting to shift institutional responsibility for its long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein onto him personally. JPMorgan has alleged that Staley, a former senior executive, misled the bank about Epstein and failed to flag risks, seeking to claw back compensation and damages tied to Epstein-related settlements. Staley countered that the bank’s claims were legally and factually

Donald Trump spent years attacking mail-in voting. Now he’s telling Republicans to vote early, absentee, by mail, or in person — whatever it takes to win.On this episode of Filtered with TJ Walker, TJ looks at Trump’s sudden reversal on mail voting and what it says about political consistency, election strategy, and loyalty to democracy.Also in the show:Meta agrees to limit teenagers to two hours a day on Instagram and Facebook, while pushing TikTok, YouTube, and Snapchat toward similar

This is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end Katie Phang’s case without further factual development because, in their view, her claims fail as a matter of law. The DOJ’s core argument is that the Epstein Files Transparency Act does not give private citizens a right to sue to enforce it. The

This is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end Katie Phang’s case without further factual development because, in their view, her claims fail as a matter of law. The DOJ’s core argument is that the Epstein Files Transparency Act does not give private citizens a right to sue to enforce it. The

This is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end Katie Phang’s case without further factual development because, in their view, her claims fail as a matter of law. The DOJ’s core argument is that the Epstein Files Transparency Act does not give private citizens a right to sue to enforce it. The

This is Document 52-1 in Phang v. Blanche, filed October 1, 2026, and it is the DOJ’s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. In plain terms, Todd Blanche and the Justice Department are asking Judge Emmet Sullivan to end Katie Phang’s case without further factual development because, in their view, her claims fail as a matter of law. The DOJ’s core argument is that the Epstein Files Transparency Act does not give private citizens a right to sue to enforce it. The

Kouri Richins is serving life without parole for killing her husband Eric — and she’s not done fighting. Prosecutors now say she’s lying to the court about why she filed a sealed motion, calling her stated reason ‘a misleading pretext.’Richins was convicted in March 2026 after a jury found her guilty on every count: aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder, insurance fraud, and forgery. She poisoned Eric with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in a cocktail at their Park City home. Two

On the day Kouri Richins’ defense team was supposed to respond to prosecutors, they didn’t. They filed a sealed motion instead — hidden from public view — asking the judge to pause her entire case. Prosecutors call the reason she gave ‘a misleading pretext.’Richins was convicted of poisoning her husband Eric Richins with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl. She tried it first on Valentine’s Day with a laced sandwich, then two weeks later with a cocktail at their home near Park City. The jury

The Court of Appeal has reserved judgment in a bid by Garvaghy Road residents to challenge a decision to allow a controversial Orange Order parade down the predominantly nationalist road. Three judges listened to almost four hours of legal arguments inside a packed courtroom in Belfast. The deadlock over the proposed march in Portadown has lasted since the 27th of September. Declan Harvey and Tara Mills report on today’s developments and ask what happens next ?

Dozens of Republicans are endorsing Democratic candidates ahead of the 2026 midterms, and new polls show Democrats competitive in red states Trump won by double digits. Conor Lamb fills in for Adam Kinzinger on why the GOP's "vote for the team" strategy is cracking. Plus: more leaked Ken Paxton audio, Trump doxxing Senator Tom Cotton, The Atlantic's report on Kash Patel and the FBI's 2020 election probe, and Trump's reversal on mail-in voting.Go deeper at

In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (Civil Action No.: 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Plaintiff Jane Doe has filed a memorandum opposing Defendant Leon Black's motion to compel her to publicly disclose her full name. Doe argues that revealing her identity would subject her to undue harassment and invasion of privacy, especially given the sensitive nature of the allegations, which include sexual assault. She emphasizes that proceeding under a pseudonym is essential to protect her from potential retaliation

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.