Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The Fifth Circuit granted the appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal. The court relied on the *Anders* procedure, finding that counsel filed a brief asserting no nonfrivolous issues existed for appellate review and that the defendant did not file a response. While the court concurred with counsel’s assessment of the appeal’s meritlessness, it explicitly declined to consider any

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The fifth-circuit granted the appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal after finding that the record was not sufficiently developed to allow a fair evaluation of the defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California* and *United States v. Flores*, concurring with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The fifth-circuit granted the Federal Public Defender’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal. The court applied the standard set forth in *Anders v. California* and Fifth Circuit Rule 42.2, reviewing the appointed counsel’s brief and the relevant record portions to concur with the assessment that the case presents no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review. As a result, counsel was excused from further

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The Fifth Circuit granted the Government’s motion for summary affirmance and affirmed the judgment of the district court. The court held that the defendant’s argument challenging the constitutionality of the sentencing enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is foreclosed by binding circuit precedent and Supreme Court authority. Specifically, the court applied the rule established in *Almendarez-Torres v. United

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The eighth-circuit granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal after conducting an independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio*. The court held that the defendant’s valid and enforceable appeal waiver, contained within a written plea agreement, barred challenges to the reasonableness of his sentence and restitution amount. Applying the standard that a waiver is enforced if

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The eighth-circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment dismissing Christopher VanHorn’s civil action against various defendants, including individuals and government entities. The court conducted a review of the record and the parties’ arguments but found no basis for reversal, issuing an unpublished per curiam opinion pursuant to Eighth Circuit Rule 47B. No specific legal standard or constitutional

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The eighth-circuit affirmed the sentence imposed on Hazim Kapic following his guilty plea to a child pornography offense, concluding that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence under an abuse-of-discretion standard of review. The court applied the legal principles established in *United States v. Feemster* regarding substantive reasonableness and noted that when a district court has varied

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The eighth-circuit granted counsel’s motion to withdraw under *Anders v. California* and dismissed the appeal because the defendant’s valid and enforceable plea agreement contained an appeal waiver that barred review of the sentencing enhancement and substantive reasonableness challenges raised. The court applied a de novo standard of review to determine the validity and scope of the waiver, finding that the

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The Eighth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment in this consolidated appeal involving a conviction for receipt of child pornography and a subsequent supervised release revocation resulting in a 224-month prison sentence. The court addressed an Anders brief filed by appointed counsel, who argued that the motion to suppress statements made to a probation officer was erroneously denied and that the sentence

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 Docket: 3:24-cv-00065-MMD-CSD The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Jane Doe’s claims against three Nevada counties for lack of Article III standing. The court applied de novo review to the standing analysis, focusing specifically on the element of causation required to show that the plaintiff’s alleged injuries were “fairly traceable” to the defendants’ conduct

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-10-06 The federal-circuit dismissed the appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) upon agreement of the parties. The court ordered that each side shall bear its own costs. As a result, the proceeding before the United States Court of Appeals is terminated, and no further action will be taken on this appeal. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Human trafficking does not always begin with kidnapping, physical restraints, or an obvious threat. In many cases, traffickers manufacture a financial obligation and then use that supposed debt to justify increasingly severe exploitation. This episode examines debt bondage, why the balance may be designed to become impossible to repay, and how an apparently ordinary financial arrangement can become a powerful instrument of coercive control.

In this episode, we separate the gripping fiction of The Americans from the gritty operational realities of the Cold War. While television depicts undercover Soviet operatives as lethal martial artists outsmarting federal agents at every turn, real espionage operated on a vastly different playbook. We explore the actual doctrine of the KGB’s Directorate S "Illegals" program, contrasting cinematic thrills with the patient, paranoid grind of deep-cover intelligence. Finally, we examine how the FBI’s

Today's Conley Commentary is about airport security. onley Commentaries are heard each weekday morning at 7:55am on the WSAU Wisconsin Morning News on AM-550 FM-99.9 and FM-95.1. And check out all of Chris' commentaries in the blog and podcast sections of wsau.com.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Local Waupaca News

Executive Preview of Episode No. 22, The Election Fraud Claim Analyzed - Part 4 This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jmorrisakajmelfa.substack.com

Today's Friday on Faith is about the death penalty. Conley Commentaries are heard each weekday morning at 7:55am on the WSAU Wisconsin Morning News on AM-550 FM-99.9 and FM-95.1. And check out all of Chris' commentaries in the blog and podcast sections of wsau.com.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Another congressman backs the movement, COS Foundation delivers pocket Constitutions to an incredible number of 8th graders, and Ben Shapiro shouts out Convention of States. More COS News

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-05 Docket: 5:25-CR-00091-SLP-1) The tenth-circuit granted the government’s motion to enforce an appeal waiver and dismissed the defendant’s appeal. The court applied the three-part standard from *United States v. Hahn*, requiring that the disputed appeal falls within the waiver’s scope, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights, and enforcement would not result in a miscarriage of

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-05 Docket: 4:19-cv-00316-RSB-CLR The eleventh-circuit dismissed the appeal sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was untimely. The court held that under 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) and the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 30-day deadline to file a notice of appeal expired on December 28, 2020, following the entry of judgment on November 24, 2020. Although the petitioner is a pro se prisoner