x

75% of people globally want unbiased news (Pew Research) but are concerned they're not getting that.

Get balanced coverage with Symby. See how stories are covered across diverse outlets and spot when one side covers a story the other skips.

PODCAST

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) Podcast

Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge

The Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law CIPIL was founded in 2004. Through its activities, CIPIL aims to promote the investigation, understanding and critical appraisal of these important fields of law. The CIPIL Intellectual Property Seminar Series brings together specialist speakers to discuss prevailing issues in relation to copyright, patents, trademarks, design rights, and other subjects. The Centre brings together a group of legal academics already recognised for their

news

All Episodes

33:23

'Copyright on E-Commerce Platforms: An Insight...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2019/01/21

Professor Dr Hong Xue of the Beijing Normal University, spoke on the topic of "Copyright on E-Commerce Platforms: An Insight Preview of Chinese New Law" at a seminar on 18 January 2019. Chinese E-Commerce Law, effective from 1 January 2019, impacts all the stakeholders in the business. This comprehensive Law revamps the copyright system applicable to e-commerce platforms by redefining their roles, responsibility and liability. E-commerce platforms are one of the powerful infrastructures that

en

56:01

'Freedom of Expression and Trade Mark Law: In Search...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/11/23

Dr Łukasz Żelechowski of Warsaw University, spoke on the topic of "Freedom of Expression and Trade Mark Law: In Search of Legal Mechanisms for Striking a Balance" at a seminar on 20 November 2018. The tension between protection of trade mark rights and considerations concerning freedom of expression and its limits has grown in recent years. The development of case law in this area in the EU and elsewhere has proven that there might be instances in which there is a need for an intervention taking

en

61:00

'The Ethical and Legal Framework within which the...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/11/19

"Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves." (Aaron Swartz). In the post-Leveson Inquiry environment, what restraints govern what newspapers publish? The statute book is full of legislation that controls and constrains speech. Most, if not all, of this legislation applies online as well as offline. These laws set boundaries, some civil (defamation, privacy, personal data and intellectual property rights) others criminal (obscenity, terrorist

en

61:00

'How Copyright Affects Free Expression: A Perspective...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/11/02

Dr Ge Chen (Durham University) spoke on the topic of 'How Copyright Affects Free Expression: A Perspective from Sino-US Trade War' at a seminar on 1 November 2018. The tension between copyright and freedom of expression has generated a spate of discussion and debates in recent copyright law discourse. Presumably, copyright may both facilitate and hinder free expression in different contexts. China’s copyright law contributes eminently to the study on this subject in that it is historically rooted

en

49:46

'Copyright Licensing for Revolutionaries' - Robert W...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/10/26

Professor Robert W. Gomulkiewicz (University of Washington) spoke on the topic of 'Copyright Licensing for Revolutionaries' at a seminar on 26 October 2018. Open access and open development have become popular approaches to creative and innovative activity. How does law, especially intellectual property law, relate to openness? Drawing on lessons from open source software, this seminar explores the legal tools used by open source revolutionaries and the role of intellectual property and contract

en

61:00

'Non-Traditional Marks In Europe: Conceptual Lessons...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/05/14

The adoption of the European Trade Mark Directive in 1989 represented an endorsement of a broad conception of trade mark subject matter. This approach was very much in line with developments elsewhere around that time. For several European countries, including the United Kingdom, this involved a substantial revision of historical resistance to trade mark registration of the shape of goods as trade marks. In the last three years, however, case law from the Court of Justice and the UK courts has

en

62:00

'The History of Patents,1600-1850' - Robert Burrell &...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/05/04

Professor Robert Burrell on "Patents and the reward system in Britain and her colonies, 1750-1850": In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries there was a system of rewards for inventors that ran in parallel to the patent system. The system of rewards formed an established part of the legal landscape for many decades and spread to at least some of Britain's colonies. At a time of renewed interest in using prizes and rewards to promote innovation, it is important to revisit how this system

en

51:32

'Fair Use by Design': Twelth Annual International...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/05/01

Professor Niva Elkin-Koren, of Haifa Center for Law and Technology delivered the twelth Annual International Intellectual Property Lecture (funded from the Herchel Smith Bequest) at Emmanuel College entitled 'Fair Use by Design' on 14 March 2016 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Niva Elkin-Koren is the founding director of the Haifa Center for Law & Technology (HCLT) and the former dean of the University of Haifa, Faculty of Law. She is also a

en

53:28

'The Parody Exception in Copyright Law' - Sabine...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/05/01

Copyright law grants exclusive rights to right-holders which prevent others from exploiting copyright-protected works without prior authorisation. However, this right is not absolute. Legislation includes specific exceptions which preclude right-holders from exercising their prerogatives in particular cases which foster creativity and cultural diversity within that society. The parody exception pertains to this ultimate objective by permitting users to reproduce copyright-protected materials for the

en

40:36

'Copyright and Property-Think': Thirteenth Annual...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Professor Litman, John F. Nickoll Professor of Law at the University of Michigan, delivered the thirteenth Annual International Intellectual Property Lecture (funded from the Herchel Smith Bequest) at Emmanuel College entitled 'Copyright and Property-Think' on 13 March 2018 as a guest of CIPIL (the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law). Professor Jessica Litman is the John F. Nickoll Professor of Law at the University of Michigan, where she teaches copyright law, trademark law, and

en

24:30

'Notice-based remedies for illegality': Przemysław...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session Three: Notice-based remedies for illegality This session will look horizontally ex post notice-based remedies that are and/or should be available in the case of alleged illegality. Many critical questions arise here. Who should be qualified to give notice – a court, an administrative authority, a claimant or anyone, including a third party? To what extent should those subject to such notice be obliged to investigate the validity of the claims? Finally, what should be the reach of any

en

27:01

'Where are we going?': Nicolo Zingales - CIPIL Annual...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session Five: Where are we going? This final session will take a more “blue-sky” approach to this topic, both as a whole and specifically in relation to the UK. If an intermediary liability system were to be devised now from scratch what ought it to look like? Are there alternatives to the focus in Europe on actor liability and responsibility for illegality which should be considered? Moreover, given the likely impending Brexit, should the UK seek a different model of regulation in this area

en

23:16

'Proactive obligations for intermediary platforms':...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session Four: Proactive obligations for intermediary platforms Whilst most debate and discussion has focused on the responsibilities of intermediaries after notice, the European Court of Human Rights in Delfi suggested that some platforms might be expected to proactively monitor and remove content that poses a particular threat to the enjoyment of human rights even before receiving such notification. Much less controversially, the European Commission’s proposal on child protection and hate speech

en

25:32

'Proactive obligations for intermediary platforms':...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session Four: Proactive obligations for intermediary platforms Whilst most debate and discussion has focused on the responsibilities of intermediaries after notice, the European Court of Human Rights in Delfi suggested that some platforms might be expected to proactively monitor and remove content that poses a particular threat to the enjoyment of human rights even before receiving such notification. Much less controversially, the European Commission’s proposal on child protection and hate speech

en

26:47

'Notice-based remedies for illegality': Jaani Riordan...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session Three: Notice-based remedies for illegality This session will look horizontally ex post notice-based remedies that are and/or should be available in the case of alleged illegality. Many critical questions arise here. Who should be qualified to give notice – a court, an administrative authority, a claimant or anyone, including a third party? To what extent should those subject to such notice be obliged to investigate the validity of the claims? Finally, what should be the reach of any

en

22:59

'Passive, active, publishers, intermediaries?': David...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session Two: Passive, active, publishers, intermediaries? Internet platforms such as Google and Facebook tend to characterise themselves as covered by intermediary shields, including those set out in the EU’s e-Commerce Directive. On the other hand, the holders of copyright and related rights, as well as spokespersons for the traditional media have increasingly argued that such platforms engage in enough control over content that they should acquire publisher responsibilities. Digital rights groups

en

28:24

'Taking stock – Where are we now?': Lorna Woods -...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session One: Taking stock – Where are we now? This introductory session will look at where we currently stand with regard to intermediary liability and responsibility in the core substantive areas of the DSM. Speakers will look variously at this issue vis-à-vis copyright and other forms of intellectual property, hate speech, children protection and personal data protection.

en

10:47

'Taking stock – Where are we now?': Frederik...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session One: Taking stock – Where are we now? This introductory session will look at where we currently stand with regard to intermediary liability and responsibility in the core substantive areas of the DSM. Speakers will look variously at this issue vis-à-vis copyright and other forms of intellectual property, hate speech, children protection and personal data protection.

en

17:49

'Taking stock – Where are we now?': Martin Senftleben...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/14

Session One: Taking stock – Where are we now? This introductory session will look at where we currently stand with regard to intermediary liability and responsibility in the core substantive areas of the DSM. Speakers will look variously at this issue vis-à-vis copyright and other forms of intellectual property, hate speech, children protection and personal data protection.

en

48:36

'Data property' - Bernt Hugenholtz: CIPIL Seminar

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2018/03/09

With the growth of the ‘data-driven economy, and the rise of ‘Big Data’ have come calls for the introduction of a novel property right in data. In its Communication on ‘Building a European data economy’ (2017) the European Commission advances the idea of creating a ‘data producer’s right’ that would protect non-personal industrial data against the world. Although the contours of this novel right are still sketchy, as are its economic underpinnings, the right would clearly go far beyond any

en

170 results

Similar Podcasts

Expres Ráno

Expres FM

PBS News Hour - Full Show

PBS NewsHour

CD Voice

China Daily

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report

Noa Levi

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

Bobby Capucci