x

75% of people globally want unbiased news (Pew Research) but are concerned they're not getting that.

Get balanced coverage with Symby. See how stories are covered across diverse outlets and spot when one side covers a story the other skips.

PODCAST

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) Podcast

Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge

The Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law CIPIL was founded in 2004. Through its activities, CIPIL aims to promote the investigation, understanding and critical appraisal of these important fields of law. The CIPIL Intellectual Property Seminar Series brings together specialist speakers to discuss prevailing issues in relation to copyright, patents, trademarks, design rights, and other subjects. The Centre brings together a group of legal academics already recognised for their

news

All Episodes

51:27

'Brexit and Data Protection Law: A Possible (Missed)...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/11/11

Speaker: Dr Henry Pearce, Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Portsmouth and Deputy Editor for Computer Law & Security Review Abstract: This presentation examines the impact of Brexit on UK data protection law and, using the introduction of the now-defunct Data Protection and Digital Information Bill as a case study, critiques the ongoing reliance on personal data as the core concept underlying UK data protection law and policy. As an alternative, the presentation explores the possibility

en

52:16

'Synthetic Data, Data Protection and Intellectual...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/10/25

Speaker: Dr Kalpana Tyagi, Assistant Professor, Maastricht University Abstract: Data protection, privacy and copyright may be closely aligned, yet distinctly respond to the common element, that is data – comprising of personal as well as non-personal elements. While data may not be copyright-protected, works (at least in their current form) are copyright-protected. As the Generative AI tools become more advanced, data and copyright-protected works may cease to bear any direct resemblance to

en

52:13

'Synthetic Data, Data Protection and Intellectual...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/10/25

Speaker: Dr Kalpana Tyagi, Assistant Professor, Maastricht University Abstract: Data protection, privacy and copyright may be closely aligned, yet distinctly respond to the common element, that is data – comprising of personal as well as non-personal elements. While data may not be copyright-protected, works (at least in their current form) are copyright-protected. As the Generative AI tools become more advanced, data and copyright-protected works may cease to bear any direct resemblance to

en

45:22

'Will Indigenous Peoples' Knowledge Transform...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/10/21

Speaker: Professor Ruth Okediji, Jeremiah Smith Jr., Professor of Law, Harvard Law School and Co-Director of the Berkman Klein Center Abstract: The conclusion of the Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in 1994 sparked a quiet revolution in the global IP system by directing unprecedented scrutiny to the maldistribution of innovation benefits among countries and communities, including Indigenous Peoples’ traditional knowledge. The unauthorized access, use, and

en

45:19

'Will Indigenous Peoples' Knowledge Transform...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/10/21

Speaker: Professor Ruth Okediji, Jeremiah Smith Jr., Professor of Law, Harvard Law School and Co-Director of the Berkman Klein Center Abstract: The conclusion of the Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in 1994 sparked a quiet revolution in the global IP system by directing unprecedented scrutiny to the maldistribution of innovation benefits among countries and communities, including Indigenous Peoples’ traditional knowledge. The unauthorized access, use, and

en

32:41

'Co-producing Automated Public Decision-Making':...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/05/10

Speaker: Dr Oliver Butler, University of Nottingham Abstract: When automated decision-making technologies (ADM) are procured and used by public authorities, important design and implementation decisions are often delegated to the professional developers they sub-contract to co-produce such technology. This can undermine accountability, democratic oversight, and the allocation of public functions determined by legislative bodies. On the other hand, in some circumstances officials might appropriately

en

32:43

'Co-producing Automated Public Decision-Making':...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/05/10

Speaker: Dr Oliver Butler, University of Nottingham Abstract: When automated decision-making technologies (ADM) are procured and used by public authorities, important design and implementation decisions are often delegated to the professional developers they sub-contract to co-produce such technology. This can undermine accountability, democratic oversight, and the allocation of public functions determined by legislative bodies. On the other hand, in some circumstances officials might appropriately

en

72:00

Reforming Data Protection – Enforcement Perspectives

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/28

On Friday 22nd March 2024, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Data Protection Reform'. This session: Session 4 – Reforming Data Protection – Enforcement Perspectives - Chair: Dr Jennifer Cobbe, CIPIL - Dr Orla Lynskey, London School of Economics - Dr Johnny Ryan, Irish Council for Civil Liberties - Dr Luca Tosoni, Norwegian Data Protection Authority - Professor Gloria Gonzalez Fuster, Vrije Universiteit Brussel For full

en

91:00

Reforming Data Protection – Substantive Perspectives...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/28

On Friday 22nd March 2024, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Data Protection Reform'. This session: Session 3 – Reforming Data Protection – Substantive Perspectives (Keynotes) - Chair: Professor David Erdos, CIPIL - Dr Winfried Veil, Data Protection Landscape - Professor Bert-Jaap Koops, Tilburg University - Professor Nadja Purtova, Utrecht University For full information about this event, please

en

60:00

UK Data Protection – The Changing Enforcement Landscape

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/28

On Friday 22nd March 2024, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Data Protection Reform'. This session: Session 2 – UK Data Protection – The Changing Enforcement Landscape - Chair: Jon Baines, Mishcon - Professor David Erdos, CIPIL - Claudia Berg, General Counsel, Information Commissioner's Office - Jim Killock, Open Rights Group For full information about this event, please

en

67:00

Reforming Data Protection – Enforcement Perspectives

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/28

On Friday 22nd March 2024, the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held its Annual Spring Conference entitled 'Data Protection Reform'. This session: Session 1 – UK Data Protection – The Changing Substantive Landscape - Introduction to Conference: Professor David Erdos, CIPIL - Chair: Dr Jennifer Cobbe, CIPIL (04:24) - Dr Michael Veale, University College London (05:12) - Gavin Freeguard, Policy Associate, Connected by Data (25:54) - Vivienne Artz, Data Strategy & Privacy

en

57:50

'Physicalism in Intellectual Property': 17th Annual...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/14

On 12 March 2024 the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held the 2024 Annual International Intellectual Property Lecture, delivered by Professor Oren Bracha (William C. Conner Chair in Law, The University of Texas, Austin). Abstract: It is a universal truism that the subject matter of modern intellectual property law is intangible information. Yet the field is haunted by a stubborn specter of physicalism. Time and again, courts and commentators engage in reasoning that

en

57:54

'Physicalism in Intellectual Property': 17th Annual...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/14

On 12 March 2024 the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL) held the 2024 Annual International Intellectual Property Lecture, delivered by Professor Oren Bracha (William C. Conner Chair in Law, The University of Texas, Austin). Abstract: It is a universal truism that the subject matter of modern intellectual property law is intangible information. Yet the field is haunted by a stubborn specter of physicalism. Time and again, courts and commentators engage in reasoning that

en

41:18

'A Counterintuitive Approach to the Interaction...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/06

Speaker: Dr Alvaro Fernandez-Mora, KCL Abstract: As trade marks have evolved to perform an expressive function, courts and scholars on both sides of the Atlantic have devoted increased attention to elucidating when, and how, marks and speech interact. Three forms of interaction can be identified in European and US case law. First, in infringement litigation, a defendant can invoke speech with a view toward insulating from liability his unauthorized use of plaintiff’s mark for expressive purposes,

en

41:21

'A Counterintuitive Approach to the Interaction...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/03/06

Speaker: Dr Alvaro Fernandez-Mora, KCL Abstract: As trade marks have evolved to perform an expressive function, courts and scholars on both sides of the Atlantic have devoted increased attention to elucidating when, and how, marks and speech interact. Three forms of interaction can be identified in European and US case law. First, in infringement litigation, a defendant can invoke speech with a view toward insulating from liability his unauthorized use of plaintiff’s mark for expressive purposes,

en

55:02

'Copyright in Fictional Characters and the Parody and...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/02/09

Speaker: Thomas St Quintin, Hogarth Chambers Abstract: Lessons from the decision of the IPEC in Shazam v Only Fools the Dining Experience, and cases referred to in that decision, addressing the findings that copyright can subsist in fictional characters (and the factors that the court relied upon in reaching that conclusion), and the defences of fair dealing for the purposes of parody and pastiche. Biography: Thomas St Quintin is a barrister at Hogarth Chambers. He specialises in intellectual

en

55:05

'Copyright in Fictional Characters and the Parody and...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/02/09

Speaker: Thomas St Quintin, Hogarth Chambers Abstract: Lessons from the decision of the IPEC in Shazam v Only Fools the Dining Experience, and cases referred to in that decision, addressing the findings that copyright can subsist in fictional characters (and the factors that the court relied upon in reaching that conclusion), and the defences of fair dealing for the purposes of parody and pastiche. Biography: Thomas St Quintin is a barrister at Hogarth Chambers. He specialises in intellectual

en

42:56

'Inventorship in the light of Thaler v....

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/02/02

Speaker: Stuart Baran, Three New Square Abstract: The UK Supreme Court recently gave judgment in Thaler, upholding the refusal of patent applications listing DABUS, an AI, as the inventor. After looking at what the UKSC decided and why, I will consider three broader questions that arise from the litigation: (i) why did the case take the shape it did – in particular, was it driven by questions of procedure more than substance?; (ii) what does the judgment mean for patents arising from AI inventions

en

42:59

'Inventorship in the light of Thaler v....

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/02/02

Speaker: Stuart Baran, Three New Square Abstract: The UK Supreme Court recently gave judgment in Thaler, upholding the refusal of patent applications listing DABUS, an AI, as the inventor. After looking at what the UKSC decided and why, I will consider three broader questions that arise from the litigation: (i) why did the case take the shape it did – in particular, was it driven by questions of procedure more than substance?; (ii) what does the judgment mean for patents arising from AI inventions

en

51:54

'The ICO’s Role in Realising a Free and Accountable...

Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law... ·

2024/01/29

Speaker: Professor Paul Wragg, University of Leeds Biography: Professor Paul Wragg is Professor of Media Law at the University of Leeds. He has written extensively on privacy and press freedom. His monograph on the compatibility of compulsory press regulation with press freedom was published by Hart in May, 2020. He is co-editor (with Professor András Koltay) of a collection of papers examining comparative privacy and defamation laws, published by Edward Elgar in July 2020 and was previously

en

169 results

Similar Podcasts

DW Noticias

DW

JIJI English News-時事通信英語ニュース-

時事通信社

Legal AF by MeidasTouch

MeidasTouch Network

Mark Levin Podcast

Cumulus Podcast Network

朝日新聞AJW 英語ニュース（The Asahi Shimbun Asia & Japan Watch）

朝日新聞ポッドキャスト