x

75% of people globally want unbiased news (Pew Research) but are concerned they're not getting that.

Get balanced coverage with Symby. See how stories are covered across diverse outlets and spot when one side covers a story the other skips.

PODCAST

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings

Join me as I relate with the world philosophically. This content can also be found on my blog: https://philosophicsblog.wordpress.com

society & culture philosophy

All Episodes

00:16:14

The Blunt Edge of Ockham's Razor

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/14

Language philosopher Bry Willis provides a critical examination of Ockham’s Razor, arguing that while it is a useful methodological tool, it is frequently misused as an absolute metaphysical law. The author contends that the concept of simplicity is subjective, as what one thinker deems a necessary explanation another may view as redundant. By treating this heuristic as an objective truth, individuals often ignore the personal biases and philosophical frameworks that influence their reasoning

en

00:15:20

Morality Is Efficient Domination

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/13

Language philosopher Bry Willis examines the Nietzschean perspective on how morality and religion function as highly efficient tools for systemic social control. By framing submission as a virtue and resistance as a sin, these frameworks internalise authority, making expensive state violence less necessary. The sources argue that traditional religious values and their modern secular equivalents serve to pacify the oppressed by making their suffering feel spiritually or morally meaningful

en

00:14:27

Architecture of Cognitive Compromise

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/12

Language philosopher Bry Willis explores the profound division over abortion through the lens of ontological grammar, arguing that the conflict is not a mere policy disagreement but a collision of fundamental realities. It suggests that individuals do not simply disagree on facts, but rather parse existence through incompatible frameworks that define what constitutes life, personhood, and bodily autonomy. Drawing on concepts like biopower and habitus, the author asserts that these moral positions

en

00:17:17

The Nerve of Being Wrong

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/12

In this reflective piece, the author examines the intellectual necessity of being wrong as a vital component of personal and philosophical growth. They argue that while individuals naturally believe their current views are correct, maintaining an openness to feedback and interdisciplinary research is essential for refining one's perspective. The text highlights how ontological frameworks—the foundational lenses through which we see the world—often cause disagreements between people who simply

en

00:17:34

Firmware, Room 101, and the Myth of Rational...

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/11

Language philosopher Bry Willis challenges the liberal assumption that human beings can be rationally persuaded to change their core beliefs through simple debate. By utilising an EPROM analogy, the author argues that our foundational worldviews function like unyielding firmware rather than easily updated software. These deep-seated ontological grammars are typically inscribed through early social conditioning and long-term environmental stability, making them incredibly resistant to change. The

en

00:06:32

Why the Gender Debate Keeps Failing: Ontology,...

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/11

The provided text outlines the complex architectural layers of gender by categorising it as a hybrid concept shaped by diverse social and scientific frameworks. It identifies four primary ontological profiles—biological, psychological, structural, and legal—each of which relies on a different constitutive authority to define what gender is. Conflict frequently arises because these models use distinct grammars that often exclude one another, particularly when determining who qualifies for

en

00:15:31

Announcement: Legibility GPT (Gender)

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/11

The provided text outlines the complex architectural layers of gender by categorising it as a hybrid concept shaped by diverse social and scientific frameworks. It identifies four primary ontological profiles—biological, psychological, structural, and legal—each of which relies on a different constitutive authority to define what gender is. Conflict frequently arises because these models use distinct grammars that often exclude one another, particularly when determining who qualifies for

en

00:16:23

Ontology, Grammar, and Incommensurability

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/11

Language Philosopher Bry Willis explores why discussions regarding gender consistently reach an impasse, suggesting the failure is philosophical rather than personal. The author argues that opposing sides operate from incommensurable ontologies, meaning they disagree on the fundamental nature of what exists and what counts as evidence. These differing frameworks create competing grammars of sense that render the opposing side’s arguments not just wrong, but entirely nonsensical. Because these

en

00:14:41

Who Decides the Best Way to Think?

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/10

This discussion features a critical debate regarding the perceived dominance of analytic philosophy over the continental tradition within modern academia. The speakers argue that analytic philosophy often prioritises technical rigour and clarity, yet critics suggest it has become boring, jargon-heavy, and increasingly disconnected from historical context. A central concern is the linguistic ascendancy of English, which forces international scholars to abandon their native philosophical roots to

en

00:16:29

Architecture of Cognitive Disagreement

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/09

This text explores how fundamental cognitive frameworks shape human perception and contribute to intractable social disagreements. The author argues that beliefs are not formed through logic alone but are instead built upon a pre-verbal ontological substrate that dictates what an individual perceives as salient or true. Because these deep-seated orientations act as a filter for all subsequent reasoning, people operating from different "grammars" often find each other's

en

00:42:13

The Grammar of Indoctrination: Semantic Limits of...

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/09

This research draft by Bry Willis challenges the liberal epistemological view that indoctrination can be resolved through critical thinking and rational dialogue. Willis argues that such frameworks, exemplified by the work of Chris Ranalli, fail because they assume language provides a neutral ground for shared reasoning. By applying philosophy of language, the author demonstrates that what counts as a reason is actually determined by semantic frameworks formed through early socialisation

en

00:16:47

Why Empires Can't Be Undone

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/07

This account challenges the notion that societies can truly revert to their original state after being transformed by imperial rule. The author argues that conquest creates permanent changes to a nation’s social and political structures, making the idea of a restorative return to pre-colonial life an impossibility. These successor states are bound by inherited systems—such as global economics and bureaucracy—that maintain their momentum through institutional inertia. Consequently, traditional

en

00:13:33

The Thermodynamics of Ideological Maintenance

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/07

NB: If you've been listening to this series, the podcasters spend several minutes recapping the parables, speaking to entropy, and reverting back to the parable. (The perils of generative AI. ) This middle is on topic.Language philosopher Bry Willis proposes that Western political and economic structures are inherently unstable and require a massive, continuous infusion of "energy" to prevent their natural decay. By applying the laws of physics to social science, the author argues

en

00:17:48

The Paradox of Domination: State, Property, and Power

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/07

This text explores the ideological divide between libertarians and anarchists, revealing a fundamental contradiction in the libertarian demand for minimal government alongside the absolute state enforcement of property. While libertarians claim to value liberty, the author argues they actually require a monopoly on state violence to protect their assets from those without property, whereas anarchists more consistently reject both the state and private ownership as interdependent systems of

en

00:14:26

Illegible Futures

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/06

In this working paper, researcher Bry Willis explores how modern institutions demand standardised emotional displays to maintain social order and progress. The author suggests that enforced optimism serves as a governance tool rather than a genuine reflection of psychological health. By framing specific mindsets as mandatory, society marginalises unconventional emotional responses, often mislabelling them as individual failures or medical dysfunctions. The text argues that this pressure to remain

en

00:14:26

Seeing Like a System

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/05

NB: The AI went a bit off the reservation, but it's still not bad.This research paper by Bry Willis explores a fundamental conflict between the controllability of artificial intelligence and its potential for true intelligence. The author argues that for AI to be legally and socially acceptable, it must remain predictable and auditable, yet these very constraints prevent the systems from achieving genuine autonomy. By drawing on historical theories of state governance, the text suggests that

en

00:12:08

Fish Are Not Arboreal by Nature

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/05

The provided text argues that modern moral reform mistakenly treats precognitive perception as if it were a changeable belief. By attempting to use dialogue and education to alter involuntary mental patterns, such as objectification, society ignores the biological architecture of the human mind. The author suggests that while behavioural expression can be regulated, the underlying internal salience cannot be fundamentally re-engineered through logic. Consequently, what is often celebrated as moral

en

00:17:53

Logic Is Your Press Secretary

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/05

This text challenges the traditional belief that human reason acts as a superior supervisor capable of overriding physical intuition. The author argues that what we perceive as a rational veto is actually just a later-arriving evaluation winning a competition between different internal systems. Drawing on various scientific and philosophical perspectives, the source asserts that logic functions as a post-hoc justification rather than an independent decision-maker. We do not possess a sovereign

en

00:16:31

Property Is Violence Disguised as Law

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/04

Through the parable of the lake and desert dwellers, language philosopher Bry Willis shares these sources to provide a deconstructive critique of property rights, arguing they are rooted in naked force rather than moral desert. The narrative illustrates how geographical accidents are transformed into legal entitlements, effectively converting a survival necessity into a marketable commodity. This framework suggests that philosophical justifications, like those of John Locke, serve as post-hoc

en

00:15:28

Property Is Luck Enforced by Violence

Philosophics — Philosophical and Political Ramblings ·

2026/02/04

Language philosopher Bry Willis explores the philosophical and psychological foundations of private property, contrasting the legitimising theories of John Locke with Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s critique of ownership as enforced scarcity. Using the "Island Reduction" parable, the author illustrates how temporal priority—simply arriving first—is converted into a permanent moral claim that can unjustly override the basic survival needs of others. The dialogue argues that property law functions

en

390 results

Similar Podcasts

Voices of Life

APG Mannheim

Promo Estereo Podcast

Promo Estereo

Talking Timelines Podcast

Talkingtimelines

גיקונומי

ראם שרמן ודורון ניר

Drømmefanger

Drømmefanger